Storage Wars the Epic Battle Rages On July 3rd, 2011
So tonight as I was getting into bed I did my normal scan twitter to see who I have pissed off or what might be going on that should rob me of sleep. Well tonight @david_Strebel asked the following questions;
“Who thinks FCoE will win over iSCSI?” and I responded “Not I” and then David asked the next logical question which was why not and here is what I had to say in the incredible detail that Twitter allows; ”l2 boundaries, specialized hardware other than nics, hate relationship from most network people.”
The problem with this answer is pretty clear though. It does not really answer the question just gives a few power point bullets to appease the crowd. I don’t feel like this is enough though. So I am going to attempt to lay out my overall view on this issue of who will win iSCSI or FCoE and why. For those of you who don’t want to read the whole article which might get a a tad windy I don’t think either will win. But I don’t think FCoE will emerge as the leader until something better come along. For those masochists who like this kind of crap read on.
Posted in 10 Gigabit Ethernet, Cisco, Consulting, Design Strategy, Errata, Hardware, HP, Network Management, Nexus, Storage | 2 Comments »
Welcome to the HP Dream world where reality does not apply. November 23rd, 2010
So last night while working on a Scalable Compute and storage design for a client, this post popped up in my twitter stream from @ErinatHP;
“New HP blog post “In the light of day – the Cisco UCS hype doesn’t match the promise” ; UCS not all its marketed to be http://bit.ly/dKj88W”
So in my normal do not let a stupid dig by a lame duck player go unmatched I responded “Oh I can’t wait to read this FUD” (you can check me out on twitter @joshobrien77)
All the twitter marketing and pissing matches aside I meant what I said and I did look forward to reading the HP Spin on where their market is vanishing to. And here are my responses, while they might not be the most technical they are not un-informed from the basis of the Cisco UCS platform or the HP C7000 with FLEX-10 Platform. And remember at the end of the day I represent me not Cisco not my employer, just little old me.
Also just so if this gets nasty I want to make sure that I am crediting this correctly:
All of the HP Writes: Are direct Quotes from Duncan Campbel with HP on his blog which you can find here: http://h30507.www3.hp.com/t5/Converged-Infrastructure/In-the-light-of-day-the-Cisco-UCS-hype-doesn-t-match-the-promise/ba-p/83537
PLEASE READ ALL of Duncan’s Post BEFORE you READ Mine. I DO NOT PRETEND to REPRESENT HIS SIDE WELL AT ALL!
Fibre Channel Notes from Learning Session January 6th, 2010
San Components: Multi-Protocol Storage Routers (ex. MDS 9222i)
- Supports FC, FCIP, iSCSI (Initiators and Targets)
- 1,2,4,8 and 10 Gbps FC and 1Gbps Ethernet (10 G is for Switch to Switch trunking. Not HBA’s exist)
- Server Based config and management just like Nexus with DCNM
Nexus 5000
- Combined Ethernet and FC switch
- 8 ports of 1/2/4 FC or 6 ports of 2/4/8 FC
- Requires both Fabric Manager and CLI or DCNM

